Raising Educational Standards
Muhammad Arif Tangi
ariftangi@gmail.com
http://www.thefrontierpost.com/article/203738/
Education sector has remained the
victim of experimentations for the last many years. These experimentations have
both positive and negative values. In the recent past efforts have been made on
many levels to bring both quantitative and qualitative improvements and high
claims are being made for addressing relevant
legislations, ensuring quality control, improving evaluation system, involving
the community and increasing access to
education. Without criticizing these efforts merely for identifying the
negative values, an attempt for further improvement is sought in the following
lines.
On legislation side, the 18th
Constitutional Amendment is a milestone for raising educational standards in
Pakistan. Under the amendment the concurrent list has been abolished and
education has been devolved to the provinces. The spirit of this amendment is
decentralization which aims at expediting decision making by empowering the
provincial authorities and reaching to the grassroots level. This development
is a positive value which is at par with the global trends in education for
increased decentralization in governance and administration. As we are in the
transitional period it will take time to fully comprehend and implement further
decentralization by empowering local administration and community through
democratic participation. On immediate level we need to hold local bodies’
elections and work for public-private partnership in education so that the process
takes a logical path.
Three legislations which could
bring long-term impacts are: Right to Free and Compulsory Education, Prohibition
of Corporal Punishment and The Protection against Harassment of Women at Workplace.
These laws, if implemented in letter and spirit, will greatly contribute
towards high educational standards in the country.
Another significant milestone for
reforms in education sector was the realization of the value of research also
called knowledge-based economy. The establishment of Higher Education
Commission (HEC) by the previous government and the subsequent PhD scholarships
both indigenous and abroad coupled with the establishment of National Testing
Service (NTS) and NTS tests for qualifying to Masters, Mphil and PhD courses
speak volumes of the successes of HEC. Increased pay structures for university
teachers and raising the requisite qualification for faculty members is another
success story. The present government further raised the higher education
standard by establishing more quality universities. The establishment of nine
universities only in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa is one example how higher education has
been promoted with the requisite global standards.
Primary and secondary schools and
degrees colleges which were previously neglected were also enthusiastically
pursued by the present government. Raising the pay structure and up-gradation
of teachers at both the federal and provincial levels is a good experiment
which deserves our appreciation. The introduction of mother tongue as medium of
instruction for the primary schools, English-medium for science subjects and increased
in technical, vocational and computer
education are all positive values of the current education system. However as
compared to universities, our schools and colleges are still lacking basic infrastructure,
quality pedagogy and an overall conducive environment for child-friendly
schooling. These schools and colleges require massive budgets to cope with some
of the private schools and colleges which are at present ensuring better
quality and results.
An important negative value of
the present education system is the administrative failures in planning,
execution, monitoring and evaluation. No Standard Operational Procedures (SOPs)
exist for ensuring merit, facilitating students and parents, devising an accountability
system for teachers or heads of the institutions and increasing the involvement
of bureaucracy at the grassroots level. This is a structural problem which is
the result of poor governance. Realizing the need to take education as
“investment” for future, the government must deal it separately from the
existing bureaucratic mechanism which is characterized by top-down decision
making, red-tapism, power hierarchy with the so-called “through proper channel”
mechanism and at times corrupt administration.
Another negative value of the
present education system is the absence of proper evaluation system. By system
I mean the existing governmental structures and operational procedures. Leaving
aside universities and other autonomous bodies which imparts education, the
evaluation of educational standards is solely restricted to boards of
intermediate and secondary education or these boards perform very limited
functions. While there is need for evaluation at all level, the existing
functions of these boards might be extended to cover all aspects of curriculum
such as research on changing educational needs or improvement in the existing
system, devising syllabus and publishing textbooks, conducting teachers
training programs, organizing and managing co-curricular activities and ensuring a multi-tiers evaluation system which
is not solely restricted to conducting annual examination but which is broader in
scope and which can grade students, teachers and educational institutions
(including government schools and colleges, private institutions and Madaris) on
a broad-based criteria of performances in different areas such as curricular
and co-curricular activities, greater community participation and exceptional
performances in different educational fields. Boards on similar pattern may
also be established at district level for primary education and the existing
technical and vocational education boards may be assigned such extended functions.
The efforts for community
involvement through democratic participation have also failed to deliver the
expected results. The idea to involve the community in school management
through Parents-Teachers Association is excellent. However, nobody bothers how
these associations are elected and how much powers are they given in the
schools management. There is no monitoring system in place and it is left to
the whim of the schools’ heads to nominate community elders in the so-called
parents’ elections which are mostly not held as per requirements and if held
are voted by a few parents who are close
to the schools heads.
In order to raise the overall
educational standards more efforts are needed. The so-called ambiguous ideological
narratives must be replaced with more pragmatic values in education. Our
curriculum needs an overhauling so that it becomes relevant to our existing
problems, having more practical utility in our day to day life and which can
foster creativity, research and economic well-being of the population. Poor
governance should be addressed as major hurdle and modern E-governance should
be introduced at all level to ensure transparency and accountability. An
inter-sectoral approach towards education is the cry of the day which will help
us addressing legislative, administrative, qualitative and quantitative
problems by adopting multiple but integrated strategies for long-term impacts.
No comments:
Post a Comment